A Speech on “Should the Us Government Increase Nasa’s Budget?”

Good (–) one and all.  I am here today to talk about whether the US government should increase NASA’s budget. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is an independent agency of the federal government of the United States which is responsible for the civilian space program, aeronautics, and space research.

NASA was established in 1958, succeeding the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA). The new agency was to possess a distinctly civilian orientation, encouraging peaceful applications in space science. Since its establishment, most US space exploration efforts are led by NASA, including the Apollo Moon landing missions, the Skylab artificial satellite, and later the space vehicle. NASA is supporting the International orbiter and is overseeing the event of the Orion spacecraft, the Space Launch System, and Commercial Crew vehicles.

The US spends about $590 billion on defense or 15%of the complete Federal budget. As compared, the best percentage of the Federal budget dedicated to NASA has been just over 4.5% in 1967. So why did the Federal budget allocation percentage drop by about 4%? After finally beating the Soviets to the moon in 1969, the keenness for space exploration dropped among the US population. The US dropped NASA’s funding percentage progressively to about 1% of the Federal budget in 1976, or by about 3.5% in one decade after the peak of the budget. 

Another excuse for this decline in funding and enthusiasm was possible thanks to the recession from 1973 to 1975, causing Americans to focus more on the here and now instead of space exploration. But it’s been almost 50 years since we landed on the moon for the primary time. So, should the US raise the share of NASA’s Federal budget or a minimum of creating a thought to boost the budget gradually? Well, that’s a sophisticated question. The primary obvious obstacle is the issue of dedicating the funds to extend NASA’s budget.

Dedicating more funds to NASA would require either the allocation of funds from other agencies like defense or Medicare or increasing the taxes paid by the US public. The problem with this can be that decreasing the funds to any program or increasing taxes would harm some citizens of the United State and would cause conflict between supporters of either side.

The foremost likely way this might be pushed through is in an equitable compromise which might make the prospects of raising the budget much more appealing. Another potential obstacle may well be the identicality that took down the budget in the first place. All and everyone, increasing the take into account NASA would drastically improve the whole thing of mankind.

From increasing technological discoveries and boosting the economy, to space exploration and colonization to save lots of our race from eventual extinction when Earth eventually becomes uninhabitable for human life whether through global climate change or a collision with a natural object. Then we are going to be able to secure the long run for all humans who will proceed with us. Thank you.

Similar Posts: